|
||
01/02/08 |
|
|
If I think my baby was hurt by negligence, does that mean my doctor is a bad doctor?Maybe, but maybe not. Let's look at it in the terms of a situation where you might have been involved in an accident. If you were to drive your car through a stop sign because you were distracted and caused a crash, you would have committed a negligent act. But this one event would not make you a bad driver or a reckless person. Everyone makes mistakes. You just had a moment of inattention - that is, you made a common human error. You are responsible for the error, but that doesn't make you a bad person. Because your obstetrician did not deliver your baby safely, this lapse does not make him a bad doctor. It is not a statement about his personal integrity, or even his general medical practices. It could be that he had a moment of inattention - a common human error - in just one unfortunate situation. Your physician has insurance to cover him, just as you have when you drive your car; because he, like you, is human and will make a mistake once in a while. Though many of us put doctors on a pedestal and expect superhuman feats, the reality is that neither "higher education" nor medical degrees protect the doctor from making mistakes. It is not up for debate as to who should be accountable for a mistake. If the doctor made a mistake that resulted in a serious injury, s/he should be held accountable, and whose insurance should pay for injuries and the other costs that flow from those injuries. Civil litigation is not a process to vilify a medical provider. It is the only process we have allowing an injured party to be compensated for their injuries. Sadly, some people who have been seriously injured, or have a loved one who has been injured by medical malpractice or negligence, fear that there will be negative consequences to society if they were to seek a legal remedy. Following are some questions you may be asking, and citations from some fair and objective studies that may help you come to terms with this very difficult issue:
n In 2005, the Texas Insurance Commission completed an intensive review of medical malpractice claims in Texas, a study that is felt to fairly represent the medical malpractice scenario in America In 2002, payouts to patients were about $515 million and Texas health care spending was about $93 billion, meaning that malpractice payouts equaled 0.6% of health care spending. This is a tiny part of the total of health care costs. In contrast, preventable medical errors that result in serious injury or death lead to billions of dollars in healthcare costs for its victims, not to mention incalculable suffering to both the patients and their loved ones.
From:
nHigh premiums are the direct result of bad insurance industry conduct. nA coalition of public interest organizations found that malpractice premiums increase when investment values decrease. “Since 1975, the data shows that in constant dollars, per doctor written premiums—the amount of premiums that doctors have paid to insurers—have gyrated almost precisely with the insurer’s economic cycle, which is driven by such factors as insurer mismanagement and changing interest rates.” nFrom: Americans for Insurance Reform, 10/10/02. nInflation and other insurance industry forces drove up doctors’ insurance premiums more than lawsuits, according to Weiss Ratings, Inc., a non-partisan, independent financial ratings company. These factors “continue to drive—med mal premiums up, evidently overwhelming any reduction in jury awards.” The factors include, among other things, 75 percent inflation in medical costs and dramatic declines in insurers’ investment income as the stock market collapsed. Clearly there are factors other than tort reform and caps that effect insurance premiums:
nFrom: Weiss Report, 6/3/03 nFor more information, see:
From:
nMedical
Malpractice Insurance: Stable Losses/Unstable Rates,
n(Director
of Insurance for the Consumer Federation of America,
former Federal Insurance Administrator and Texas
Insurance Commissioner) October 10, 2002.
From: FL,
Palm Beach Post Editorial, 7/16/03; OH, Toledo
Blade, 7/17/04; PA, Allentown Morning Call,
4/24/04; WA, Seattle Times, 2/23/04
A study released on [March 10, 2005] casts doubt on whether recent
"tort reform" in Texas that limited
payouts in medical malpractice lawsuits
and is similar to what President Bush
wants nationally was really needed.
The study looked at Texas Department of
Insurance records dating back to 1988
and found claims that medical costs were
soaring because of too many malpractice
lawsuits, the supposed reason for the
reform, were not true.
"We find no evidence of the medical
malpractice crisis that produced
headlines over the last several years
and led to legal reform in Texas and
other states," said the study, conducted
by law professors at the University of
Texas, University of Illinois and
Columbia University law schools.
"Everyone who is collecting data is
finding more or less the same thing --
there is no evidence of a tort crisis,"
he told Reuters.
"The clear implication is that 'runaway
medical malpractice litigation' makes a
poor poster child for the cause of tort
reform," said the study, which was
released at the Texas law school in
Austin.
In 2003, in response to the alleged
litigation crisis, Texas passed a law
placing a $250,000 cap on certain
damages in medical malpractice lawsuits.
But the study found that insurance
payouts, jury awards in malpractice
lawsuits and costs of legal defense had
changed little between 1988 and 2002
The only thing that jumped, they said,
was the cost of malpractice insurance,
which rose 135 percent from 1999 to 2003
likely because of financial pressures
that had nothing to do with litigation.
nThirty
years ago, politicians in
California were persuaded by
insurance companies, HMO’s and
the medical establishment, that
the civil justice system was
broken.
The Legislature passed
the Medical Injury Compensation
Reform Act (MICRA) in 1975. The
changes enacted as a result of
MICRA have worked very well -
for the insurance industry.
nDoctors didn’t
fare so well. In
California, the changes
did NOT bring
down the cost of
professional liability
insurance for doctors.
nIn fact,
premiums for physicians
increased 191 percent in
California between 1976
and 1988.
nThe
cost of insurance for
doctors did not
stabilize until after
California voters passed
insurance reform in
1988. Insurance costs
have risen predictably
since.
nThe data
from other
states that
enacted reform
was not much
different,
according to the
1996 U.S.
General
Accounting
Office report,
"Medical
Malpractice: Six
State Case
Studies Show
Claims and
Insurance Costs
Still Rise
Despite
Reforms."
|
|

This site was last updated 01/22/07